Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1206

reference
699-tree-1
name
1206
tree-preservation-order

undefined

699-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006546 50.889364)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006475 50.889356,-1.006478 50.889370,-1.006488 50.889383,-1.006503 50.889393,-1.006523 50.889399,-1.006545 50.889402,-1.006567 50.889400,-1.006587 50.889393,-1.006603 50.889383,-1.006613 50.889371,-1.006617 50.889357,-1.006614 50.889343,-1.006604 50.889331,-1.006589 50.889321,-1.006569 50.889314,-1.006547 50.889312,-1.006525 50.889314,-1.006505 50.889320,-1.006489 50.889330,-1.006479 50.889342,-1.006475 50.889356)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL